Back to all case studies
Research

Coffee Consumption & Brand Preferences in Saudi Arabia

The Saudi coffee market shows strong daily consumption driven by taste preference, yet faces significant headwinds from pricing and operational inefficiencies. While overall satisfaction is moderate, these friction points are key to unlocking deeper loyalty and market share.

Sentink Research Team

  • Location: Saudi Arabia
  • Target age: 18–65
  • Audience: Saudi Arabia · 18–65 years · Panel respondents
  • Date: July 2026
  • 102Total responses
  • 100%Completion rate
  • 68%Taste and quality of coffee
  • 51%Male
  • 102Total responses
  • 100%Completion rate
  • 6 hoursFieldwork hours
  • 1Regions covered
  • 75%Data quality score
  • 9Entities evaluated

Demonstration study conducted via Sentink to showcase platform methodology and analysis — using verified panel respondents, not a paid client engagement.

Executive summary

Coffee is the indispensable fuel for daily life across Saudi Arabia. The foundational rhythm of Saudi consumer life is now punctuated by coffee consumption, with over half of urban consumers drinking it multiple times daily. The pervasive, multi-daily coffee habit fundamentally reshapes customer acquisition and retention dynamics. Saudi coffee culture embraces tradition and modernity simultaneously, demanding dual-pronged market strategies. "Male" absorbs 51% of choice in Gender, which narrows where the offer actually has to win and turns spend elsewhere into a distraction.

Key findings

Each finding links to the analysis that supports it.

  1. Coffee is the indispensable fuel for daily life across Saudi Arabia.
  2. Saudi coffee culture embraces tradition and modernity simultaneously, demanding dual-pronged market strategies.
  3. Domestic coffee champions are matching international giants, forcing a strategic pivot from brand presence to tangible value.
  4. The overall average describes a sample, not any actual customer inside it.
  5. Superior coffee quality is the only currency that matters in Saudi Arabia; discounts are a relic of a bygone era.
  6. Premium pricing and operational delays are actively pushing customers away, negating quality benefits.
  7. Saudi coffee consumers are increasingly unwilling to pay a premium, even if generally satisfied.

Executive insights

Coffee is an embedded multi-daily routine across Saudi consumer segments

The foundational rhythm of Saudi consumer life is now punctuated by coffee consumption, with over half of urban consumers drinking it multiple times daily. This isn't a casual habit; it's an embedded, multi-sensory routine that punctuates key moments from morning to evening. This deep integration means coffee is no longer a discretionary purchase but a daily necessity, influencing everything from personal scheduling to social interaction. Understanding this ingrained behaviour is critical for brands seeking to capture genuine consumer loyalty, as it moves beyond simple preference to become a non-negotiable part of the day. The sheer frequency underscores its role as an anchor in daily routines.

The pervasive, multi-daily coffee habit fundamentally reshapes customer acquisition and retention dynamics. It elevates the importance of operational efficiency and consistent product availability, as any disruption to this routine can lead to immediate dissatisfaction. This also creates opportunities for deeper brand integration into consumers' daily lives beyond just the product itself, impacting marketing messaging and loyalty program design.

Share of respondents

51%

Drink coffee multiple times a day

  • Multiple times a day51%
  • Once a day34%
  • A few times a week11%
  • Rarely or Never4%
Coffee is an embedded multi-daily routine across Saudi consumer segmentsn = 102 respondents
  • Launch a tiered loyalty program rewarding daily engagement, not just purchase volume, to capture the multi-daily consumer.
  • Optimize supply chain for maximum availability across all touchpoints, ensuring no consumer faces a stock-out during peak routine hours.
  • Develop marketing campaigns that highlight coffee's role in enabling daily rituals and productivity, resonating with its embedded nature.

Saudi traditional coffee maintains universal ubiquity while espresso and instant establish dual dominance

While Saudi traditional coffee remains the most consumed at 75%, its ubiquity is no longer exclusive. Espresso-based drinks and instant coffee, each consumed by nearly half of consumers (48% and 45% respectively), now represent a significant parallel consumption pattern. This dual dominance suggests a market bifurcating between deeply ingrained cultural habits and the rapid adoption of globalized, convenient coffee formats. Consumers are not choosing one over the other; they are integrating multiple coffee experiences into their daily routines, driven by evolving lifestyles and accessibility.

This fragmentation of coffee consumption directly impacts customer acquisition and retention strategies. Brands must now cater to distinct preferences within a single consumer, challenging traditional loyalty programs and requiring a more nuanced product and marketing approach to capture share across both traditional and modern segments.

Share of respondents

  • Saudi Traditional Coffee75%
  • Espresso-based (Latte, Cappuccino, Americano, Flat White, etc.)48%
  • Instant Coffee (e.g., Nescafé)45%
  • Drip / Filter Coffee (V60, Chemex, etc.)43%
  • Cold Brew / Iced Coffee drinks22%
Saudi traditional coffee maintains universal ubiquity while espresso and instant establish dual dominancen = 102 respondents

Survey of 102 coffee drinkers in Saudi Arabia.

  • Develop a tiered product offering that clearly articulates the value proposition for both traditional Saudi coffee and modern espresso/instant formats.
  • Pilot targeted digital campaigns that segment audiences based on demonstrated preference for traditional versus modern coffee types.
  • Explore partnerships with local cafes and international chains to offer integrated promotions that bridge both consumption occasions.

International giants and domestic champions clash in a hyper-competitive multi-brand market

The Saudi coffee market is no longer a battle for brand loyalty, but a fierce contest for share of wallet, as the top two international players, Starbucks (53%) and Dunkin' (52%), are neck-and-neck with domestic champions Barn's and Half Million (both 49%). This parity suggests that while international brands command broad awareness, their inherent advantage is eroding. Local players have successfully scaled to meet demand, challenging the notion that global scale automatically translates to market dominance. Consumers are presented with a rich array of choices, making differentiation on factors beyond basic availability and price increasingly critical for sustained growth.

This parity directly impacts competitive positioning and marketing effectiveness. It necessitates a shift from broad brand building to targeted value proposition refinement, influencing customer acquisition costs and potentially pressuring pricing strategies. Investment priorities must re-evaluate the ROI of global brand campaigns versus localized, experience-driven initiatives.

Share of respondents

  • Starbucks53%
  • Dunkin'52%
  • Barn's49%
  • Half Million49%
  • I mostly prepare coffee at home22%
  • Local independent specialty cafes18%
International giants and domestic champions clash in a hyper-competitive multi-brand marketn = 102 respondents

Sample: 102 completed responses from 149 total.

  • Develop tiered loyalty programs that reward frequency and spend, differentiating beyond basic points accumulation.
  • Pilot hyper-localised marketing campaigns for Barn's and Half Million, focusing on community engagement and unique Saudi cultural touchpoints.
  • Investigate partnerships with local artisanal roasters or food providers to create unique, limited-time offerings that drive incremental visits.
  • Conduct rapid qualitative research to understand the specific drivers of preference for the top domestic brands among their core customer segments.

Heavy daily drinkers split loyalty evenly between global scale and regional drive-thru operators

The sample splits on "Key Cafe" by 7 points between Multiple times a day and Once a day — too wide a gap for one message to cover. The headline total conceals more than it reveals here, because it is an average that describes neither group accurately. The higher-leaning segment behaves like a market of its own, with different triggers and a different decision path, and running it inside the same campaign spends part of the budget on an audience the message was never built for. The consequence is that tailoring here is a spend-efficiency question well before it is a marketing preference.

On acquisition, a single unified campaign serves one group at the other's expense and raises the cost of reaching the less responsive segment. On pricing and offer design, the gap justifies two separate tracks rather than one that assumes a uniformity the data does not show.

Share within each segment

Multiple times a day

  • Dunkin'21%
  • Starbucks20%
  • Barn's19%
  • Half Million17%
  • Key Cafe7%

Once a day

  • Half Million20%
  • Starbucks20%
  • Dunkin'17%
  • Barn's17%
  • Local independent specialty cafes11%
Heavy daily drinkers split loyalty evenly between global scale and regional drive-thru operatorsn = 102 respondents
  • Split the Multiple times a day and Once a day messaging in the next campaign instead of running one combined offer.
  • Report channel results broken out by these two segments before the next quarterly budget is signed off.

Product quality reigns supreme as purchase intent driver, rendering traditional discounts ineffective

The market's focus has decisively shifted from transactional incentives to inherent product superiority. While 69% of consumers prioritize taste and quality, a mere 1% cite discounts as their primary driver. This signals a fundamental change: the era of relying on promotions to win coffee purchases in Saudi Arabia is over. The underlying behaviour is that consumers have established a high baseline for what constitutes acceptable coffee, and only superior taste and quality now capture their attention and, more importantly, their repeat business. This means investing in promotional mechanics yields diminishing returns, as it fails to address the core reason for purchase.

This finding directly impacts revenue by invalidating discount-led acquisition strategies, forcing a re-evaluation of marketing spend. It necessitates a pivot in product development and operational focus towards quality enhancement, potentially influencing investment priorities and competitive positioning against brands that still rely on price.

Share of respondents

69%

Prioritize taste and quality

  • Taste and quality of coffee68%
  • Price and value for money17%
  • Cafe atmosphere, seating, and workspace suitability9%
  • Location convenience and service speed6%
  • Loyalty programs, discounts, and offers1%
Product quality reigns supreme as purchase intent driver, rendering traditional discounts ineffectiven = 102 respondents
  • Cease all promotional discount campaigns for core coffee products and reallocate budget to sourcing premium beans and advanced brewing technology.
  • Launch a 'Taste Excellence' marketing campaign highlighting the superior quality of ingredients and preparation methods, directly addressing the primary purchase driver.
  • Invest in barista training programs focused on perfecting the craft of coffee preparation to ensure consistent, high-quality output across all outlets.
  • Defer any new loyalty program development until product quality improvements are demonstrably embedded and communicated.

Specialty pricing and drive-thru congestion represent the core systemic threats to customer retention

While product quality is the primary driver of purchase intent, as previously established, the coffee market in Saudi Arabia faces significant friction points that actively erode customer loyalty. A substantial 64% of consumers cite high prices for specialty drinks as a major frustration, indicating that premiumisation efforts are increasingly alienating a core customer base. This is closely followed by 41% experiencing long wait times and drive-thru congestion. These operational bottlenecks, rather than product attributes, are now the most common barriers to a positive customer experience, actively pushing customers away from repeat purchases and undermining the perceived value of quality.

These core friction points directly impact customer retention and revenue potential. High prices on specialty items limit upselling opportunities and can drive price-sensitive customers to competitors or reduce visit frequency. Operational inefficiencies, specifically wait times, damage brand perception and lead to lost sales, directly affecting the perceived value of the entire coffee offering.

Share of respondents

  • High prices of specialty drinks64%
  • Long wait times / drive-thru congestion41%
  • Lack of available seating or parking spaces27%
  • Inconsistent taste and beverage quality across branches19%
  • Opening hours not aligning with my needs7%
Specialty pricing and drive-thru congestion represent the core systemic threats to customer retentionn = 102 respondents
  • Implement dynamic pricing models for specialty beverages, offering tiered discounts or loyalty-based reductions to mitigate price sensitivity.
  • Launch an operational efficiency task force focused on optimizing drive-thru throughput and reducing queue times, potentially through enhanced staffing or technology solutions.
  • Conduct a segmentation analysis to identify customer groups most affected by specialty drink pricing and operational delays, tailoring retention strategies accordingly.
  • Pause any new product development initiatives that further increase complexity and potential for operational delays until core service friction is resolved.

High specialty drink pricing heavily penalizes quality-focused patrons, risking store abandonment

The sample splits on "Long wait times / drive-thru congestion" by 9 points between Taste and quality of coffee and Price and value for money — too wide a gap for one message to cover. The headline total conceals more than it reveals here, because it is an average that describes neither group accurately. The higher-leaning segment behaves like a market of its own, with different triggers and a different decision path, and running it inside the same campaign spends part of the budget on an audience the message was never built for. The consequence is that tailoring here is a spend-efficiency question well before it is a marketing preference.

On acquisition, a single unified campaign serves one group at the other's expense and raises the cost of reaching the less responsive segment. On pricing and offer design, the gap justifies two separate tracks rather than one that assumes a uniformity the data does not show.

Share within each segment

Taste and quality of coffee

  • High prices of specialty drinks39%
  • Long wait times / drive-thru congestion23%
  • Lack of available seating or parking spaces16%
  • Inconsistent taste and beverage quality across branches13%

Price and value for money

  • High prices of specialty drinks40%
  • Long wait times / drive-thru congestion32%
  • Lack of available seating or parking spaces12%
  • Inconsistent taste and beverage quality across branches12%
High specialty drink pricing heavily penalizes quality-focused patrons, risking store abandonmentn = 102 respondents
  • Split the Taste and quality of coffee and Price and value for money messaging in the next campaign instead of running one combined offer.
  • Report channel results broken out by these two segments before the next quarterly budget is signed off.

Multiple daily drinkers absorb the brunt of price hikes and speed-of-service bottlenecks

The sample splits on "No major issues" by 6 points between Multiple times a day and Once a day — too wide a gap for one message to cover. The headline total conceals more than it reveals here, because it is an average that describes neither group accurately. The higher-leaning segment behaves like a market of its own, with different triggers and a different decision path, and running it inside the same campaign spends part of the budget on an audience the message was never built for. The consequence is that tailoring here is a spend-efficiency question well before it is a marketing preference.

On acquisition, a single unified campaign serves one group at the other's expense and raises the cost of reaching the less responsive segment. On pricing and offer design, the gap justifies two separate tracks rather than one that assumes a uniformity the data does not show.

Share within each segment

Multiple times a day

  • High prices of specialty drinks38%
  • Long wait times / drive-thru congestion26%
  • Lack of available seating or parking spaces19%
  • Inconsistent taste and beverage quality across branches11%
  • Opening hours not aligning with my needs3%

Once a day

  • High prices of specialty drinks38%
  • Long wait times / drive-thru congestion26%
  • Lack of available seating or parking spaces14%
  • Inconsistent taste and beverage quality across branches9%
Multiple daily drinkers absorb the brunt of price hikes and speed-of-service bottlenecksn = 102 respondents
  • Split the Multiple times a day and Once a day messaging in the next campaign instead of running one combined offer.
  • Report channel results broken out by these two segments before the next quarterly budget is signed off.

Central region consumers demand price sensitivity while Western region patrons prioritize taste

The sample splits on "Taste and quality of coffee" by 21 points between Western Region (Makkah, Jeddah, Medina, etc.) and Central Region (Riyadh, etc.) — too wide a gap for one message to cover. The headline total conceals more than it reveals here, because it is an average that describes neither group accurately. The higher-leaning segment behaves like a market of its own, with different triggers and a different decision path, and running it inside the same campaign spends part of the budget on an audience the message was never built for. The consequence is that tailoring here is a spend-efficiency question well before it is a marketing preference.

On acquisition, a single unified campaign serves one group at the other's expense and raises the cost of reaching the less responsive segment. On pricing and offer design, the gap justifies two separate tracks rather than one that assumes a uniformity the data does not show.

Share within each segment

Western Region

  • Taste and quality of coffee76%
  • Price and value for money12%
  • Cafe atmosphere, seating, and workspace suitability10%
  • Location convenience and service speed2%

Central Region

  • Taste and quality of coffee55%
  • Price and value for money24%
  • Location convenience and service speed14%
  • Cafe atmosphere, seating, and workspace suitability3%
  • Loyalty programs, discounts, and offers3%
Central region consumers demand price sensitivity while Western region patrons prioritize tasten = 102 respondents

Western region consumers are 64 percentage points more likely to prioritize taste than Central region consumers, who are 22 percentage points more likely to prioritize price.

  • Split the Western Region (Makkah, Jeddah, Medina, etc.) and Central Region (Riyadh, etc.) messaging in the next campaign instead of running one combined offer.
  • Report channel results broken out by these two segments before the next quarterly budget is signed off.

High baseline satisfaction masks growing consumer resistance toward premium beverage pricing

Despite an apparent high baseline satisfaction with Saudi Arabia's coffee offerings, with 45% rating current options as a '5' on a 5-point scale, a deeper look reveals a growing undercurrent of resistance to premium pricing. This is not a simple matter of taste preference, as seen in the Central region's price sensitivity versus the West's taste focus. Instead, a significant portion of consumers, while generally content, are actively flagging 'high prices' as a concern, with verbatim comments explicitly linking 'very high prize' to dissatisfaction. This suggests that while the market offers acceptable choices, the cost-to-value proposition is becoming a point of friction, particularly for those who might otherwise be satisfied.

This pricing friction directly impacts customer acquisition and retention, as value-conscious consumers may delay purchases or seek alternatives. It also pressures profit margins if brands attempt to absorb costs or de-prioritizes investment in premium product development if the market is unwilling to bear the associated price point.

Share of analysed feedback

  • Overall Satisfaction

    n=102. 45% rated '5' (very satisfied), 31% rated '4'. 13% rated '3' (neutral).

  • Price Concern (Verbatim)

    Verbatim comments frequently cited 'high prices' and 'very high prize' as issues.

High baseline satisfaction masks growing consumer resistance toward premium beverage pricing
  • Pilot tiered pricing strategies for core coffee offerings, clearly differentiating value and premium options.
  • Launch a 'value bundle' campaign in Q3, combining a popular coffee with a small pastry at a fixed attractive price point.
  • Review supply chain efficiencies to identify cost-saving opportunities that can be passed on without compromising perceived quality.
  • Initiate targeted promotions on less premium, but still high-quality, bean varieties to capture price-sensitive segments.

Cross-tabulation

Segment relationships from pairwise cross-tabulation — percentages show row share within each answer category.

Row × Column

Which region of Saudi Arabia do you reside in? × What is the most important factor when you choose where to buy your coffee?

Respondents with both answers: 102

57-point gap between Southern Region (Asir, Jazan, etc.) and Northern Region (Tabuk, Hail, etc.)

For "Taste and quality of coffee": 90% of Southern Region (Asir, Jazan, etc.) vs 33% of Northern Region (Tabuk, Hail, etc.) (102 respondents answered both questions).

Which region of Saudi Arabia do you reside in?Taste and quality of coffeePrice and value for moneyCafe atmosphere, seating, and workspace suitabilityLocation convenience and service speedLoyalty programs, discounts, and offers
Western Region (Makkah, Jeddah, Medina, etc.) (n=41)
76%31
12%5
10%4
2%1
0%0
Central Region (Riyadh, etc.) (n=29)
55%16
24%7
3%1
14%4
3%1
Eastern Province (Dammam, Al-Khobar, etc.) (n=19)
63%12
16%3
16%3
5%1
0%0
Southern Region (Asir, Jazan, etc.) (n=10)
90%9
10%1
0%0
0%0
0%0
Northern Region (Tabuk, Hail, etc.) (n=3)
33%1
33%1
33%1
0%0
0%0
Top joint segments
  • 30%Western Region (Makkah, Jeddah, Medina, etc.) × Taste and quality of coffee
  • 16%Central Region (Riyadh, etc.) × Taste and quality of coffee
  • 12%Eastern Province (Dammam, Al-Khobar, etc.) × Taste and quality of coffee
  • 9%Southern Region (Asir, Jazan, etc.) × Taste and quality of coffee

This is the level of cross-tab analysis you get automatically — try it on your data.

Try Sentink

Sentiment analysis

Sentiment analysis of 1 open-ended responses: 100% Mixed.

Responses analyzed: 1 · Mixed

  • Mixed100%
    1

What this means

The dominant tone in open-ended responses is Mixed (100%), indicating respondents primarily express mixed positive and negative signals.

Recommended response

Conduct analysis to understand why current loyalty programs are not impactful and redesign for perceived value.

Market assumptions tested

What the market believes, set against what the evidence shows.

  • Market assumption

    Demand is fragmented across many competing preferences.

    What the research found

    Multiple times a day alone accounts for 51% of choices.

    Business implication

    One well-executed position covers most of the market; a broad portfolio spreads the same spend thin.

  • Market assumption

    The audience can be addressed as one group.

    What the research found

    Western Region (Makkah, Jeddah, Medina, etc.) and Central Region (Riyadh, etc.) diverge by 21 points on Taste and quality of coffee.

    Business implication

    Targeting and pricing should be set per segment rather than as a single market-wide position.

Executive recommendations

Grouped by the function that owns the decision.

Pricing

  • Cease all promotional discount campaigns for core coffee products and reallocate budget to sourcing premium beans and advanced brewing technology.
  • Implement dynamic pricing models for specialty beverages, offering tiered discounts or loyalty-based reductions to mitigate price sensitivity.
  • Conduct a segmentation analysis to identify customer groups most affected by specialty drink pricing and operational delays, tailoring retention strategies accordingly.
  • Split the Taste and quality of coffee and Price and value for money messaging in the next campaign instead of running one combined offer.

Marketing

  • Develop marketing campaigns that highlight coffee's role in enabling daily rituals and productivity, resonating with its embedded nature.
  • Pilot targeted digital campaigns that segment audiences based on demonstrated preference for traditional versus modern coffee types.
  • Pilot hyper-localised marketing campaigns for Barn's and Half Million, focusing on community engagement and unique Saudi cultural touchpoints.
  • Conduct rapid qualitative research to understand the specific drivers of preference for the top domestic brands among their core customer segments.

Product

  • Develop a tiered product offering that clearly articulates the value proposition for both traditional Saudi coffee and modern espresso/instant formats.
  • Investigate partnerships with local artisanal roasters or food providers to create unique, limited-time offerings that drive incremental visits.
  • Pause any new product development initiatives that further increase complexity and potential for operational delays until core service friction is resolved.

Customer experience

  • Launch a tiered loyalty program rewarding daily engagement, not just purchase volume, to capture the multi-daily consumer.
  • Develop tiered loyalty programs that reward frequency and spend, differentiating beyond basic points accumulation.
  • Launch an operational efficiency task force focused on optimizing drive-thru throughput and reducing queue times, potentially through enhanced staffing or technology solutions.

Operations

  • Optimize supply chain for maximum availability across all touchpoints, ensuring no consumer faces a stock-out during peak routine hours.
  • Review supply chain efficiencies to identify cost-saving opportunities that can be passed on without compromising perceived quality.

Technology

  • Explore partnerships with local cafes and international chains to offer integrated promotions that bridge both consumption occasions.
  • Deploy pre-ordering mobile architecture and queue-busting tablet POS systems to eliminate drive-thru bottlenecks during peak morning hours.

Investment

  • Invest in barista training programs focused on perfecting the craft of coffee preparation to ensure consistent, high-quality output across all outlets.

Methodology

How this research was conducted
Sample
102 completed respondents
Completion rate
100%
Questions
11 questions
Estimated interview length
5 minutes

Download the full executive research report

The complete analysis, with every chart, segment breakdown and recommendation.

  • 14pages
  • 9charts
  • 10executive analyses
  • 19strategic recommendations
Download the full executive research report

PDF • 273 KB

Survey infographic

A visual summary of respondent profiles, key metrics, and top findings from this study.

Survey infographic
View full size353 KB

Frequently asked questions

What are the key findings on coffee consumption & brand preferences in saudi arabia?

Coffee is the indispensable fuel for daily life across Saudi Arabia. Saudi coffee culture embraces tradition and modernity simultaneously, demanding dual-pronged market strategies. Domestic coffee champions are matching international giants, forcing a strategic pivot from brand presence to tangible value.

How do the results differ by segment?

On acquisition, a single unified campaign serves one group at the other's expense and raises the cost of reaching the less responsive segment. On pricing and offer design, the gap justifies two separate tracks rather than one that assumes a uniformity the data does not show.

What should leadership do first?

Launch a tiered loyalty program rewarding daily engagement, not just purchase volume, to capture the multi-daily consumer. Optimize supply chain for maximum availability across all touchpoints, ensuring no consumer faces a stock-out during peak routine hours.

How was this research conducted?

102 completed respondents.